Science  People  Locations  Timeline
Index: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z

Home > Waste management


 Contents
Waste management is literally the process of managing waste materials (normally those produced as a result of human activities). It involves the collection, transport, processing and/or disposal of waste materials. Historically, the aim of waste management has been to prevent or reduce the impact of waste materials on human health or local amenity. Over the last thirty years, however, the focus of waste management in developed countries has shifted to reducing the impact of waste on the environment and recovering resources from waste materials.

Waste management can involve solid, liquid and/or gaseous wastes, and the methods involved for each are disparate. Entire fields of expertise exist for the management of each type of waste.

Waste management practices are often very different between urban and rural areas, and residential and industrial/commercial producers, even within the same local region. Waste management for non-hazardous residential and institutional waste streams in metropolitan areas is usually (but not always) the responsibility of local government authorities. Waste Management for non-hazardous commercial and industrial wastes is usally (but not always) the responsibility of the generator. The management (and composition) of waste is usually quite different in developed and developing nations, for a number of reasons.

1 Waste Management Concepts

The field of waste management has a number of different concepts, which vary in their usage between countries or regions.

1.1 The Waste Hierarchy

The waste hierarchy, as a concept, classifies different waste management strategies according to their desirability. The term ‘3 Rs’, or ‘Reduce-Reuse-Recycle’, has also been used for the same purpose. The waste hierarchy has taken many forms over the past decade, but the basic concept has remained the cornerstone of most waste minimisation strategies. The aim of the waste hierarchy is to extract the maximum practical benefits from products and to generate the minimum amount of waste.

Some waste management experts have recently incorporated a 'third R': "Re-think", with the implied meaning that the present system may have fundamental flaws, and that a thoroughly effective system of waste management may need an entirely new way of looking at waste. Some "re-think" solutions may be counter-intuitive, such as cutting fabric patterns with slightly more "waste material" left -- the now larger scraps are then used for cutting small parts of the pattern, resulting in a decrease in net waste. This type of solution is by no means limited to the clothing industry.

1.2 Extended Producer Responsibility

Extended producer responsibility (EPR) is the practice of holding the producer of a product responsible to some extent for the management of the waste products associated with that product. The producer is responsible to recover products that contain toxic and hazardous constituents which may present a threat to the safety of the community and which may place a burden on the end-of-life management of the product, for example motor vehicles, whitegoods, tyres, electronic equipment and mobile phones.

This concept has arisen in recent years due to the belief that an industry's responsibility for a product should not end with the sale of that product, but should extend to its reuse and/or disposal. EPR is often a voluntary measure within an industry, but in some countries it is a legislated requirement.

1.3 Product Stewardship

Product stewardship is sometimes referred to as a subset of EPR. Product stewardship shares responsibility between all elements of the supply chain including government, consumers, brand owners, producers and recyclers. It is usually employed for more environmentally benign products - products that do not present a major environmental impact – such as beverage containers or packaging materials.

2 Waste Management Techniques

Managing domestic, industrial and commercial waste has traditionally consisted of collection, followed by disposal. Depending upon the type of waste and the area, a level of processing may follow collection. This processing may be to reduce the hazard of the waste, recover material for recycling, produce energy from the waste, or reduce it in volume for more efficient disposal.

Collection methods vary widely between different countries and regions, and it would be impossible to describe them all. For example, in Australia most urban domestic households have a 240-litre bin that is emptied weekly by the local Council. Many areas, especially those in less developed areas, do not have a formal waste-collection system in place.

Disposal methods also vary widely. In Australia, the most common method of disposal of solid waste is to landfills, because it is a large country with a low-density population. By contrast, in Japan it is more common for waste to be incinerate d, because the country is smaller and land is scarce.



Read more »

Non User