| • Science | • People | • Locations | • Timeline |
Waste management can involve solid, liquid and/or gaseous wastes, and the methods involved for each are disparate. Entire fields of expertise exist for the management of each type of waste.
Waste management practices are often very different between urban and rural areas, and residential and industrial/commercial producers, even within the same local region. Waste management for non-hazardous residential and institutional waste streams in metropolitan areas is usually (but not always) the responsibility of local government authorities. Waste Management for non-hazardous commercial and industrial wastes is usally (but not always) the responsibility of the generator. The management (and composition) of waste is usually quite different in developed and developing nations, for a number of reasons.
The field of waste management has a number of different concepts, which vary in their usage between countries or regions.
The waste hierarchy, as a concept, classifies different waste management strategies according to their desirability. The term ‘3 Rs’, or ‘Reduce-Reuse-Recycle’, has also been used for the same purpose. The waste hierarchy has taken many forms over the past decade, but the basic concept has remained the cornerstone of most waste minimisation strategies. The aim of the waste hierarchy is to extract the maximum practical benefits from products and to generate the minimum amount of waste.
Some waste management experts have recently incorporated a 'third R': "Re-think", with the implied meaning that the present system may have fundamental flaws, and that a thoroughly effective system of waste management may need an entirely new way of looking at waste. Some "re-think" solutions may be counter-intuitive, such as cutting fabric patterns with slightly more "waste material" left -- the now larger scraps are then used for cutting small parts of the pattern, resulting in a decrease in net waste. This type of solution is by no means limited to the clothing industry.
This concept has arisen in recent years due to the belief that an industry's responsibility for a product should not end with the sale of that product, but should extend to its reuse and/or disposal. EPR is often a voluntary measure within an industry, but in some countries it is a legislated requirement.
Managing domestic, industrial and commercial waste has traditionally consisted of collection, followed by disposal. Depending upon the type of waste and the area, a level of processing may follow collection. This processing may be to reduce the hazard of the waste, recover material for recycling, produce energy from the waste, or reduce it in volume for more efficient disposal.
Collection methods vary widely between different countries and regions, and it would be impossible to describe them all. For example, in Australia most urban domestic households have a 240-litre bin that is emptied weekly by the local Council. Many areas, especially those in less developed areas, do not have a formal waste-collection system in place.
Disposal methods also vary widely. In Australia, the most common method of disposal of solid waste is to landfills, because it is a large country with a low-density population. By contrast, in Japan it is more common for waste to be incinerate d, because the country is smaller and land is scarce.