Home > Toccata and Fugue in D Minor

The opening of the work is probably familiar to most people. In the musical score it looks like this:

Opening notes of the "Toccata and Fugue in D Minor".

1 Reception

The work is unquestionably a favorite of the listening public. This includes not just classical music enthusiasts, but also the many people who know the work only through its numerous appearances (see below) in popular culture.

Musical critics have also admired the work. For instance, it is described by ( Uwe Kraemer ) as having "ecstatic technical virtuosity and [also] mastery of form" and by ( Hans-Joachim Schulze ) as having "elemental and unbounded power ... that only with difficulty abates sufficiently to give place to the logic and balance of the Fugue".

2 Peter Williams's theories

In an influential paper ("BWV 565: a toccata in D minor for organ by J. S. Bach?", Early Music, vol. 10, July, 1981, pp. 330-337), Peter Williams has offered two theories about this work.

2.1 Not by Bach

Williams argues that the work is not by Bach. In support of this view, he cites the following:

• There is no autograph score.
• The copyist who created the oldest known manuscript ( Johann Ringk , 1717-1778) was a student-of-a-student of Bach, who had access to some of the Bach manuscripts and whose reputation is dubious: he is believed to have passed off inauthentic (as well as authentic) works under the composer's name.
• The work abounds in fermata s and dynamic markings, not ordinarily used in organ music in Bach's day.
• Lastly, Williams judges that various musical passages in the work are simply too crude musically to have been Bach's work.

William's views have more recently been endorsed in a book-length study by the musicologist Rolf Dietrich Claus, cited below.

2.2 Violin transcription

Williams's second theory is that the Toccata and Fugue was not originally written for organ, but in fact is a transcription of a work for solo violin. Williams places this original violin work a fifth higher, in the key of A minor, so that the work begins dramatically on a high E and descends almost to the lowest note on the instrument:

Under this account, many aspects of the work fall into place.

• The fairly plain musical texture would reflect the general texture of Bach's well known solo sonatas and partitas for violin, which often convey a contrapuntal texture implicitly, rather than through double-stopping.
• Various passages echo a violin technique in which sixteenth notes (semiquavers) are played by alternating between strings--Williams's conjectured key of A minor places many of these notes on an open string, which would fit with other passages in Bach's solo violin works.
• The use of parallel octaves in the opening, otherwise unusual in Bach's music, would be a natural way to give greater weight to a solo violin line.
• The passage at m. 137 strongly suggests quadruple-stopped chords on a violin, along the following lines:

Williams put his theory into practice by writing a reconstruction of the conjectured original violin work, which has been performed (by violinist Jaap Schröder ) and published. The violinist Andrew Manze subsequently produced his own reconstruction, also in A minor, which he has performed widely and recorded.

Williams's article is available at the fee-charging Web site of Early Music; a summary appears at this link: [1], on the Web site of www.bachfaq.org.

2.3 Violin-to-organ transcriptions by Bach

At least twice in his career, Bach is known to have transcribed solo violin works for organ. The Prelude first movement of the Partita in E major for solo violin, BWV 1006, was converted by Bach into the solo organ part of the opening movement of the Cantata BWV 29 Wir danken dir, Gott, wir danken dir. Bach also transcribed the Fugue movement of his Sonata in G minor for solo violin BWV 1001 as organ music, namely as the second half of the Prelude and Fugue in D minor for organ, BWV 539.

Peter Williams does not mention these potential parallels in his article, probably because he feels that they are irrelevant in light of his Theory #1 (that Bach was not the composer of the Toccata and Fugue in D Minor). For those who do believe that Bach was the composer of this work, the fact that Bach was apparently not averse to making violin-to-organ transcriptions could be taken as collateral support for the view that the Toccata is also a transcription of violin music.