2 Construction

Today geologists know that the type of rock found in the San Francisquito Canyon is unsuitable for supporting a dam and a reservoir. But in the 1920s, two of the world's leading geologists at the time, John C. Branner of Stanford University and Carl E. Grunsky , found no fault with the San Francisquito rock. The dam was built squarely over the San Francisquito earthquake fault, although this fault has since been inactive.

In 1924, construction began on the St. Francis Dam, which was given an anglicized version of the name of the creekbed on which it rested. The project began quietly so that the farmers dependent on the water of the San Francisquito Creek wouldn't notice the dam and try to stop the construction.

3 Major alterations

The St. Francis Dam was designed to be 175 feet (53m) tall and to hold back a reservoir of 30,000 acre-feet (37 million m³). Immediately after construction began in 1924, Mulholland decided to raise the dam 10 feet (3m) and increase the capacity of the reservoir to 32,000 acre-feet (39 million m³). Since little construction had been done some minor changes were made in the design to accommodate the change. However, in July of 1925, when the dam was about halfway completed, Mulholland again decided to raise the dam another 10 feet (3m) to a total height of 195 feet (59 m). A "wing dyke" had to be constructed on the western side of the dam to keep water from spilling over a low ridge when the reservoir filled. The new capacity was 38,170 acre-feet (47 million m³).

Gravity dams, like the St. Francis Dam was and the Hoover Dam is today, use their weight to resist the water pressure exerted on them. The St. Francis Dam was increased in height from the designed 175 feet (53 m) to 195 feet (59 m) at completion, without any substantial widening of the dam's base. Such changes would not occur with modern engineering practices, but little was said about the changes in 1925.

4 Sabotage

In 1927 a few people in Owens Valley who were fighting the California Water Wars dynamited the Los Angeles Aqueduct several times. The St. Francis Dam and Reservoir saved Los Angeles from a severe water shortage and water from the reservoir also generated electricity. Mulholland called the dam "providential."

During the height of the Water War there was a threat made against the St. Francis Dam and an anonymous informant pleaded to the Los Angeles police to "get some officers up there quick." Fortunately no attempt was made to dynamite the dam.

5 Prelude to failure

Several cracks appeared in the dam throughout 1926 and 1927. Some began to leak. Mulholland inspected these cracks and found them to be of no consequence. All concrete dams form cracks over time.

On March 7, 1928, the St. Francis Reservoir was completely filled for the first time. New leaks were discovered by the damkeeper, Tony Harnischfeger, but Mulholland was convinced they were relatively minor.

Another factor in the failure could have been the construction of a new road along the east abutment, which was over the ancient landslide. Blasting with dynamite for the new road was done right up until March 8, 1928, and much of it right next to the unstable abutment. It is unknown if the blasting could have loosened the rock or not.

On the morning of March 12, Harnischfeger discovered a new leak and worried that it was undermining the dam. Mulholland, his son Perry, and assistant Harvey van Norman investigated. Perry thought the leak looked serious, but Mulholland felt it to be typical of concrete dams, and declared the leaks safe.

6 Failure

The dam finally crumbled at 11:57 p.m. on March 12, 1928, scarcely 12 hours after Mulholland had inspected it. There were no surviving eyewitnesses to the failure, but one man on the road about a half mile (1 km) away from the dam recalls feeling a strange shaking of the ground and the sound of "crashing, falling blocks." The shaking he felt was no earthquake ( seismographs recorded no significant earth movements) but rather the tumble of incredibly heavy pieces of concrete that were falling off the dam.

Exactly how and why the dam failed has never been completely determined. Engineer and geologist J. David Rogers has published the most comprehensive account of the dam's failure, which he says was caused by uplift, the instability of the paleomegalandslide , and Mulholland's unwise raising of the dam's height.

Tony Harnischfeger was probably the first to die in the floodwave, which was about 125 feet (38 m) high when it hit his little cottage in the San Francisquito Canyon. His body was never recovered.

7 The disaster

Twelve billion gallons (45 million m³) of water surged down the San Francisquito Canyon, crushing the heavy concrete walls of a hydroelectric power plant sweeping away everything else in its path. The flood continued down the San Francisquito then into the Santa Clara River bed. The towns of Castaic Junction in Los Angeles County and Fillmore, Bardsdale , and Santa Paula in Ventura County were hit especially hard.

Bravery was seen in the actions of telephone operators and motorcycle policemen who notified people in their homes of the dangers, until the rising floodwaters forced them to retreat.

8 The aftermath

The exact number of dead remains unknown to this day. The official count made in August 1928 stood at 385. However more bodies were discovered every few years until the 1950s, and the remains of another victim were found deep underground near Newhall in 1992. It is generally accepted that the death toll was between 400 and 500.

Mulholland shouldered all the blame willingly. He was so easily made a scapegoat that the initial investigations weren't as thorough as they might have been. Although Mulholland accepted the blame, he hinted during his trial for manslaughter that he felt the dam was sabotaged.

The dam was not rebuilt. Several large pieces of concrete were not swept away by the waters, including the center section of the dam which remained standing upright. After the death of a young man, who fell from a large piece of concrete while exploring the ruins two months after the failure, the remains of the dam were dynamited and jackhammered into oblivion.

Today all that remain are a few weathered chunks of gray concrete and the rusted remains of the handrails that lined the top of the dam. The ruins are easy to see from the San Francisquito Canyon Road, about five miles north of the city of Newhall.

9 Further reading

• Outland, Charles F. Man-Made Disaster: The Story of St Francis Dam. A.H. Clark Company: 1977.

Outland's study of the dam and the ensuing flood, first published in 1963, is the only widely published comprehensive work about the dam, the failure, and the disaster. This book, the result of good original research, is difficult to find.

• Nunis Jr., Doyce B. (Ed.). St. Francis Dam Disaster Revisited. Historical Society of South California. 2002. BooksEnthsiast.com.

This collection of articles about the dam includes contributions from Catherine Mulholland, William Mulholland's granddaughter, and Dr. J. David Rogers. It is the only other book on the St. Francis Dam in print today.

10 See also

• Teton Dam
• Kelly Barnes Dam

11 External links

• The Santa Clarita Valley Historical Society This webpage on the St. Francis Dam has dozens of excellent photographs of the dam under construction, completed, and its ruins.
• The Failure of the St. Francis Dam Dr. J. David Roger's technical descriptions of the dam failure, with a few colorized images of what the dam would have looked like in color. (Note: this page has large pictures, and loads slowly for dialup users.)

California history Dams Engineering failures Disasters

<Hide>