Home > Set-builder notation

The simplest sort of set-builder notation is {x : P(x)}, where P is a predicate in one variable. This indicates the set of everything satisfying the predicate P, that is the set of every object x such that P(x) is true. For example:

• {x : x is a real number and x > 0} is the set of all positive real numbers;
• {k : for some natural number n, k = 2n} is the set of all even natural numbers;
• {a : for some integers p and q, q is not zero and a = p/q} is the set of rational numberIn mathematics, a rational number (or informally fraction is a ratio of two integers, usually written as the vulgar fraction a ''b where b is not zero. The set of all rational numbers is denoted by Q or in blackboard bold. Using the set-builder notation is; and
• {S : S is a set and S does not belong to S} is the set of all sets that don't belong to themselves.

The last example shows how set-builder notation can be tricky. The set described in that example in fact cannot exist (see Russell's paradoxRussell's paradox is a paradox discovered by Bertrand Russell in 1901 which shows that the naive set theory of Cantor and Frege is contradictory. Consider the set M to be "The set of all sets that do not contain themselves as members". Formally: A is an e).

For this reason, set-builder notation can be modified to certain special forms. One of these is {x in A : P(x)}, where A is a previously defined set. This indicates the set of every element of A that satisfies the predicate P. For example:

• {x in R : x > 0}, where R is the set of real numbers, is the set of all positive real numbers.

In axiomatic set theorySet theory is a branch of mathematics created principally by the German mathematician Georg Cantor at the end of the 19th century. Initially controversial, set theory has come to play the role of a foundational theory in modern mathematics, in the sense o, this set is guaranteed to exist by the axiom schema of separation. We avoid Russell's paradox here because there is no set of all sets (at least not in the usual development of axiomatic set theory).

Another variation on set-builder notation describes the members of the set in terms of members of some other set. Specifically, {F(x) : x in A}, where F is a function symbol and A is a previously defined set, indicates the set of all values of members of A under F. For example:

• {2n : n in N}, where N is the set of all natural numbers, is the set of all even natural numbers.

In axiomatic set theory, this set is guaranteed to exist by the axiom schema of replacementSet theory In axiomatic set theory and the branches of logic, mathematics, and computer science that use it, the axiom schema of replacement is a schema of axioms in Zermelo-Fraenkel set theory. Suppose P is any predicate in two variables that doesn't use.

These notations can be combined in the form {F(x) : x in A, P(x)}, which indicates the set of all values under F of those members of A that satisfy P. For example:

• {p/q : p in Z, q in Z, q is not zero}, where Z is the set of all integers, is the set of all rational numbers.

This example also shows how multiple variables can be used (both p and q in this case).

The notation can be complicated, especially as in the previous example, and abbreviations are often employed when context indicates the nature of a variable. For example:

• {x : x > 0}, in a context where the variable x is used only for real numbers, indicates the set of all positive real numbers;
• {p/q : q is not zero}, in a context where the variables p and q are used only for integers, indicates the set of all rational numbers; and
• {S : S does not belong to S}, in a context where the variable S is used only for sets, indicates the set of all sets that don't belong to themselves.

As the last example shows, such an abbreviated notation again might not denote an actual nonparadoxical set, unless there is in fact a set of all objects that might be described by the variable in question.