Science  People  Locations  Timeline
Index: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z

Home > Roman surface


 

Surfaces

The Roman surface (so called because Jakob Steiner was in Rome when he thought of it) is a self-intersecting immersion of the real projective plane into three-dimensional space, with an unusually high degree of symmetry.

The simplest construction is as the image of a sphere centered at the origin under the map f(x,y,z) = (yz,xz,xy). This gives us an implicit formula of

Also, taking a parametrization of the sphere in terms of longitude (θ) and latitude (φ), we get parametric equations for the roman surface as follows:

x = r2 cos θ cos φ sin φ
y = r2 sin θ cos φ sin φ
z = r2 cos θ sin θ cos2 φ

The origin is a triple point, and each of the xy-, yz-, and xz-planes are tangential to the surface there. The other places of self-intersection are double points, defining segments along each axis which terminate in pinch points. The entire surface has tetrahedral symmetry. It is a particular type (called type 1) of Steiner surface.


1 Derivation of implicit formula

The points on a sphere have coordinates

.

To these points, apply a transformation T defined as

so that the transform of the sphere has points whose coordinates are

From equation (1) it follows that

Equations (2), (3), and (4) combine through multiplication, producing these next three equations:

Equations (5), (6), and (7) combine through addition, producing

Factor out the x2 y2 on the right side,

Now factor out on the right side,

Multiplying the three components of equation (1) yields

therefore equation (8) can be restated as

where r is the radius of the original sphere; the Roman surface does not have a radius.

2 Derivation of parametric equations

Let a sphere have radius r, longitude φ, and latitude θ. Then its parametric equations are

Then, applying transformation T to all the points on this sphere yields

which are the points on the Roman surface. Let φ range from 0 to 2π, and let θ range from 0 to π/2.

3 Relation to the real projective plane

The sphere, before being transformed, is not homeomorphic to the real projective plane, RP2. But the sphere centered at the origin has this property, that if point (x,y,z) belongs to the sphere, then so does the antipodal point (-x,-y,-z) and these two points are different: they lie on opposite sides of the center of the sphere.

The transformation T converts both of these antipodal points into the same point,

If this were true for only one or small subset of points of the sphere, then these points would just be double points. But since it is true of all points, then it is possible to consider the Roman surface to be homeomorphic to a "sphere modulo antipodes", S2 / {1,-1}, i.e. a sphere whose antipodal points are equivalent. The real projective plane is known to be homeomorphic to a sphere modulo antipodes, therefore the Roman surface is homeomorphic to RP2.

4 Structure of the Roman surface

The Roman surface has four bulbous "lobes", each one on a different corner of a tetrahedron.

A Roman surface can be constructed by splicing together three hyperbolic paraboloids and then smoothing out the edges as necessary so that it will fit a desired shape (e.g. parametrization).

Let there be these three hyperbolic paraboloids:

These three hyperbolic paraboloids intersect externally along the six edges of a tetrahedron and internally along the three axes. The internal intersections are loci of double points. The three loci of double points: x = 0, y = 0, and z = 0, intersect at a triple point at the origin.

For example, given x = y z and y = z x, the second paraboloid is equivalent to x = y / z. Then

and either y = 0 or z2 = 1 so that . Their two external intersections are

Likewise, the other external intersections are

Let us see the pieces being put together. Join the paraboloids y = x z and x = y z. The result is shown in Figure 1.


Figure 1.


The paraboloid y = x z is shown in blue and orange. The paraboloid x = y z is shown in cyan and purple. In the image the paraboloids are seen to intersect along the z = 0 axis. If the paraboloids are extended, they should also be seen to intersect along the lines

The two paraboloids together look like a pair of orchids joined back-to-back.

Now run the third hyperbolic paraboloid, z = x y, through them. The result is shown in Figure 2.


Figure 2.


On the West-Southwest and East-Northeast directions in Figure 2 there are a pair of openings. These openings are lobes and need to be closed up. When the openings are closed up, the result is the Roman surface shown in Figure 3.


Figure 3. Roman surface.


A pair of lobes can be seen in the West and East directions of Figure 3. Another pair of lobes are hidden underneath the third (z = x y) paraboloid and lie in the North and South directions.

If the three intersecting hyperbolic paraboloids are drawn far enough that they intersect along the edges of a tetrahedron, then the result is as shown in Figure 4.


Figure 4.


One of the lobes is seen frontally -- head on -- in Figure 4. The lobe can be seen to be one of the four corners of the tetrahedron.

If the continuous surface in Figure 4 has its sharp edges rounded out -- smoothed out -- then the result is the Roman surface in Figure 5.


Figure 5. Roman surface.


One of the lobes of the Roman surface is seen frontally in Figure 5, and its bulbous -- balloon-like -- shape is evident.

If the surface in Figure 5 is turned around 180 degrees and then turned upside down, the result is as shown in Figure 6.


Figure 6. Roman surface.


Figure 6 shows three lobes seen sideways. Between each pair of lobes there is a locus of double points corresponding to a coordinate axis. The three loci intersect at a triple point at the origin. The fourth lobe is hidden and points in the direction directly opposite from the viewer. The Roman surface shown at the top of this article also has three lobes in sideways view.



Read more »

Non User