Science  People  Locations  Timeline
Index: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z

Home > Rational-legal authority


 Contents
Rational-legal authority (also known as rational authority, legal authority, rational domination, legal domination) is a form of leadership in which the authority of an organization or a ruling regime is largely tied to legal rationality , legal legitimacy and bureaucracy. The majority of the modern states of the twentieth century are rational-legal authorities, according to those who use this form of classification.

1 Rational-legal authority in sociology

In sociology, the concept of rational-legal domination comes from Max Weber's tripartite classification of authority (one of several classifications of government , used by sociologists); the other two forms being traditional authority and charismatic authority. All of those three domination types represent an example of his ideal type concept. Weber noted that it in history those ideal types of domination are always found in combinations.

In traditional authority, the legitimacy of the authority comes from tradition. Charismatic authority is legitimized by the personality and leadership qualities of the ruling individual. Finally, rational-legal authority derives its powers from the system of bureaucracy and legality.

1.1 Legal rationality and legitimacy

In the modern state, people (and legal practitioners) attribute legitimacy to a legal order insofar as its laws have been enacted (this concept of legal authority and its legitmacy should be understood in the light of arguments of the natural law and legal positivism).

Weber defined legal order as a system where the rules are implemented and obeyed in the belief that they are legitimate because they conform with the statuses of a government that monopolizes their enactment and the legitimate use of physical force.

1.2 Emergence of the modern state

Weber wrote that the distinctively rational characteristics of the state emerged from the patrimonial and feudal struggle for power that can be found only in Western civilisation. The prerequisites for the modern Western state are:

* centrally directed and permanent system of taxation
* centrally directed and permanent system of military force

Weber argued that some of those attributes have existed in various time or places, but combined they have emerged only in the OccidentalOccidental means generally " western". It is a traditional designation (especially when capitalized) for anything belonging to the Occident or West — the western part of the classical world ( Europe) and the New World, and especially of its society. The O civilisation. The conditions that favoured this were:

* development of the money economy, where officials are compensated in money instead of kind (usually land grants)
* quantitative and qualitative expansion of administative tasks
* expansion on officialdom due to its centralisation and increased efficiency over past alternative methods of administration

Weber's belief that rational-legal authority did not exist in Imperial China has been heavily criticism, and does not have very many supporters in the early 21st century.



Read more »

Non User