| • Science | • People | • Locations | • Timeline |
| Contents | ||
In the following article, the field of scalars denoted F is either the field of real numbers R or the field of complex numbers C. See below.
Formally, an inner product space is a vector space V over the field F together with a bilinear form, called an inner product
satisfying the following axiomFor the algebra software named Axiom, see Axiom (algebra software). For the 1970s Australian rock music group, see Axiom (band). In epistemology, an axiom is a self-evident truth upon which other knowledge must rest, from which other knowledge is built ups:
Note that if F=R, then the conjugate symmetry property is simply symmetry of the inner product, i.e.
In this case, sesquilinearity becomes standard linearThe word linear comes from the latin word linearis which means created by lines''. In mathematics, a linear function f ''x is one which satisfies the following two properties (but see below for a slightly different usage of the term): Additivity: f ''x +ity.
Remark. Many mathematical authors require an inner product to be linear in the first argument and conjugate-linear in the second argument, contrary to the convention adopted above. This change is immaterial, but the definition above ensures a smoother connection to the bra-ket notationBra-ket notation is the standard notation for describing quantum states in the theory of quantum mechanics. It can also be used to denote abstract vectors and linear functionals in pure mathematics. It is so called because the inner product of two states used by physicists in quantum mechanicswavefunctions of an electron in a hydrogen atom possessing definite energy (increasing downward: n 1,2,3,. and angular momentum (increasing across: s p d . Brighter areas correspond to higher probability density for a position measurement. The angular mom and is now often used by mathematicians as well. Some authors adopt the convention that < , > is linear in the first component while < | > is linear in the second component, although this is by no means universal. For instance the G. Emch reference does not follow this convention.
There are various technical reasons why we have to restrict the basefield to R and C in the definition. Briefly the basefield has to contain an ordered subfield (in order for non-negativity to make sense) and therefore has to have characteristic equal to 0. This immediately excludes finite fields. The basefield has to have additional structure, such as a distinguished automorphism.
In some cases we need to consider non-negative semi-definite sesquilinear forms. This means that <x, x> is only required to be non-negative. We show how to treat these below.