| • Science | • People | • Locations | • Timeline |
Moore was best known for his advocacy of common sense, his ethical non-naturalism, and his very clear, circumspect writing style. He was a methodical and careful philosopher. He is very much a "philosopher's philosopher"--influential among and greatly respected by other philosophers, but relatively unknown to nonphilosophers (unlike his friend and colleague Russell).
Moore's most famous essays are "The Refutation of Idealism", " A Defence of Common Sense", and "A Proof of the External World" each of which can be found in his collection of papers, Philosophical Papers. He argued against skepticism about the external world by, famously, raising his right hand and saying 'here is a hand', then raising his left hand and saying 'here is a hand', conluding that there are at least two material objects in the world and therefore, there is an external world.
G.E. Moore died on October 24, 1958 and was interred in the Burial Ground of Parish of the Ascension, Cambridge, England. The poet Nicholas MooreNicholas Moore ( 1918 1986) was an English poet, associated with the New Apocalyptics in the 1940s, who later dropped out of the literary world. He was born in Cambridge; his father was G. He was educated at the Dragon School, Oxford, Leighton Park School is his son.
Moore is also well-known for the so-called " open question argument," which is contained in his (also greatly influential) Principia Ethica . The Principia is one of the main inspirations of the movement against ethical naturalismNaturalism sometimes also called definism is a theory in meta-ethics that holds that ethical terms can be defined; the meaning of ethical sentences can be given in totally non-ethical terms. So to the question, "Can the meaning of ethical sentences be res (see ethical non-naturalism) and is partly responsible for the twentieth-century concern with meta-ethicsIn philosophy, ethics is commonly divided into two branches, normative ethics and meta-ethics . Normative ethics addresses questions such as "What actions are good and bad?" and "What should we do?" Thus, a theory of normative ethics will endorse some eth.
Moore charged that most other philosophers who worked in ethics had made a mistake he called the " Naturalistic fallacyThe naturalistic fallacy is an alleged logical fallacy concerning the semantics and metaphysics of ethical value. It was first explicitly discussed in the book Principia Ethica by British philosopher G. Moore claims that the naturalistic fallacy is commit". The business of ethics, Moore agreed, is to discover the qualities that make things good. So, for example, hedonistsHedonism is any theory that gives pleasure a central role. The simplest form of hedonism in ethics is "whatever causes pleasure is right". Even that simple version immediately runs into trouble. Pleasure for whom? Average pleasure? Is that the median or t about value claim that the quality being pleasant is what makes things good; other theorists could claim that complexity is what makes things good. With this project Moore has no quarrel. What he objects to is the idea that, in telling us the qualities that make things good, ethical theorists have thereby given us an analysis of the term 'good' and the property goodness. Moore regards this as a serious confusion. To take an example, a hedonist might be right to claim that something is good just in case it is pleasant. But this does not mean, Moore wants to insist, that we can define value in terms of pleasure. Telling us what qualities make things valuable is one thing; analyzing value is quite another.