| • Science | • People | • Locations | • Timeline |
| Contents | ||
A republic, in the classical form, is a type of government that is made up of a mixture of elements from three other types of government: monarchy, aristocracy, and democracy. There is the Spartan model which is a tri-political government of kings, gerousia ( aristocracy) and Ephors (democratic body). There is the Roman model that has a civilian head, and an aristocratic body which is the Senate. It is marked by a bicameral legislative body (the upper house being aristocratic) and by a written constitution that marks out the duties and responsibilities of the different bodies. A classical republic is considered by its proponents to be the best compromise between the interests of the aristocracy (or of the wealthy elite) and those of the people.
Some ancient republics:
The Founding Fathers of the United States certainly took at least some inspiration from classical republics. Curiously, Sir Thomas Smyth also described England under Queen Elizabeth IElizabeth I ( September 7, 1533 March 24, 1603) was Queen of England and Queen of Ireland from November 17, 1558 until her death. Sometimes referred to as The Virgin Queen or Good Queen Bess Elizabeth I was the fifth and last monarch of the Tudor dynasty, as a republic in De Republica Anglorum; the Manner of Government or Policie of the Realme of England, {1583}. In modern times, most republics no longer feel it necessary or appropriate to adhere to strict classical forms, given all the changes that have occurred in the world since those forms were first proposed.
The Greeks defined differing governments by their dominant factor. Aristotle writes: "Now a constitution (Politeia) is the ordering of a state (Poleos) in respect of its various magistracies, and especially the magistracy that is supreme over all matters. For the government is everywhere supreme over the state and the constitution is the government. (3) Our customary designation for a monarchy that aims at the common advantage is 'kingship'; for a government of more than one yet only a few 'aristocracy', ...while when the multitude govern the state with a view to the common advantage, it is called by the name common to all the forms of constitution, 'constitutional government'. (4) Where a government has only a king, the dominant factor, it is called a monarchy. Where a government has only a few nobles ruling, the dominant factor, it is called an aristocracy." Where the people are the dominant factor it is called a democracy.
The Greek word for State is "Poleos". It denotes "society" in general. Aristotle writes "A collection of persons all alike does not constitute a state". (5) This Greek word, "Politeia" is then named for every government that includes all classes of people as citizens and a written law, constitution that defines and delegates rights and responsibilities of those classes. A republic is one that does not have a dominant factor".
"Politea" is a Greek word used by AristotleAristotle ( Greek Αριστοτλης Aristotelēs) ( 384 BCE March 7, 322 BCE) was a Greek scientist and philosopher. Along with Plato, he is often considered to be one of the two most influential philo in his book, Politics, to describe a republican form of government.
Aristotle records that "some people assert that the best constitution must be a combination of all the forms of constitution, therefore praise the constitution of Sparta." (6) He further argues that the better the constitution is mixed, the more permanent it is. (7) The definition he gives for this kind of government is a "politean"; the form intermediate between them which is termed a republic, (mesi de touton in kalousi politeian) for the government is constituted from the class that bears arms. (8) Again, Aristotle states that constitutional government is, to put it simply, a mixture of oligarchy and democracy. (9)
PolybiusPolybius ca 203 BC 120 BC) was a Greek historian of the Mediterranean world, especially the rise of the Roman Republic, which he attributed to Roman fitness and the excellence of Roman civic and military institutions. He is most valued for his account of (as also Plato and Aristotle) distinguishes three types of governments: "kingship, aristocracy, democracy". Furthermore, like Aristotle, he goes on to state that the best constitution is that "which partakes of all these three elements". (10) "The first to construct a constitution--that of Sparta--on this principle", LycurgusIn Greek mythology, the name Lycurgus could refer to three people: #An alternate name for Lycomedes. Lycurgus (Thrace): a King of who banned the cult of Dionysus, and paid dearly. Lycurgus (Sparta): the legendary lawgiver. Lycurgus is also the name of an, with some inspiration from his fellow Doric brothers in Crete (11) created a government that combined an hereditary kingship with body of advisors from the aristocracy and another that represented the rest of the people (the democracy), all being checks and balances on each other.Plato in the Laws records how the Cretans and the Spartans could not classify their own form of government:
Megillus the Spartan: Why sir, when I consider our Lacedaemonian constitution, I really cannot tell you offhand which would be the proper name for it. It actually seems to have its resemblances to an autocracy--in fact, the power of our ephors is astonishingly autocratic--and yet at times I think it looks like the most democratic of all societies. Again, it would be sheer paradox to deny that it is an aristocracy, while yet again a feature of it is a life monarchy, asserted by all mankind, as well as ourselves, to be the very oldest of such institutions.
Clinias the Cretan: I find myself in the same perplexity as you, Megillus. I am quite at a loss to identify our Cnossian constitution confidently with any of them.
The Athenian (Plato): That, my friends, is because you enjoy real constitutions, whereas the types we have specified are not constitutions, but settlements enslaved to the domination of some component section, each taking its designation from the dominant factor. (15)
Sparta is the site where in the first time in Greek political life and in Western culture that a body of councillors took initiative and responsibility for presenting proposals and resolutions to an assembly. This occurred in the eighth or seventh century B.C. (16)
Duties and responsibilities in the Spartan Republic are outlined in short verses called Rhetra (the constitution). These Rhetra are attributed to Lycurgus, the lawgiver of the Lacedaemonians. The Spartan society consisted of two kings from two different royal families called the Agiads and the Eurypontids. There also existed from former times a royal council called the Gerousia. Members of the Gerousia were appointed for life from the head of the aristocratic families. The council was made of 28 aristocratic members with two kings sitting in making a total of thirty. Upon this basis did Lycurgus add the Rhetra circa 776 B.C. At some time, an oligarchic body with members elected from the citizen body for one year was introduced called the Ephors. It was the Ephors who presided over an assembly of all the Spartan citizens called Spartiates which could only shout approval or disapproval of measures presented by the two bodies, the Gerousia and the Ephors. The whole legislative process required two legislative bodies and the whole body of citizens to affirm it. Furthermore, the Lycurgan constitution spelled out that if the demos passed crooked rhetra the gerousia and the kings were to veto them.
The American constitution was influenced by Cicero. Cicero also terms the republic as a "mixed form of constitution". Michael Grant explicates the significance of Cicero: "This 'mixed' constitution, previously admired by the historian Polybius (to whom Cicero's debts were extensive), reappeared again and again in early discussions of the constitution of the United States of America, figuring prominently, for example, in John Adams Defense of the Constitutions of Government of the United States (1787). (17) Cicero was familiar with Dicaearchus of Messana who wrote a treatise on the mixed constitution of Sparta, the Tripoliticus. (18) Dicaerchus "was greatly admired by Cicero".
Cicero provides the knowledge train of this history of tri-political government:
"This type of discussion, which I am undertaking, derives most of its material from that other philosophical school, of which Plato, was the leader. The men who came after him, Aristotle and Heraclides of Pontus, another follower of Plato, threw light on the whole topic of national constitutions through the inquiries they conducted. Moreover, as you know, Theophrastus, Aristotle's disciple specialized in this type of investigation; and another of Aristotle's pupils, Dicaearchus, was active in the same field of study."(19)
The modality of mixed government is explained by Cicero: "When however, instead, a group of men seize the state by exploiting their wealth or noble birth or some other resource, that is a political upheaval, though they call themselves conservatives. If, on the other hand, the people gain the supremacy, and the whole government is conducted according to their wishes, a state of affairs has arisen which is hailed as libery, but is, in fact, chaos. But when there is a situation of mutual fear, with one person or on class fearing another, then because nobody has sufficient confidence in his won strength a kind of bargain is struck between the ordinary people and the men who are powerful." The result, in that case, is the mixed constitution which Scipio recommends. (It is footnoted as monarchy, oligarchy and democracy.) Which means that weakness, not nature or good intention, is the mother of justice." (20)
The Roman Republic was formed basically on a tri-partite form. There were two consuls who were equal in authority and who were elected for a year, the Roman Senate which was a broad based oligarchy of about fifty aristocratic families and the citizens who were organized into Roman assemblies (comitia) which were further delineated into curia, tribes and centuries.
The Senate would pass resolutions and magistrates would present them before their respective assemblies. The citizens would either approve or disapprove the resolutions. The consuls would then carry out the decree.
Aristotle does not use the word democracy and republic interchangeably; neither does Socrates in Plato's Republic. In that historical period at least, they were seen as different institutions.
Aristotle defines a republic as the rule of law. "...it is preferable for the law to rule rather than any one of the citizens, and according to this same principle, even if it be better for certain men to govern, they must be appointed as guardians of the laws and in subordination to them;... the law shall govern seems to recommend that God and reason alone shall govern..." (21)
He further argues that a democracy puts the people above the law: "men ambitious of office by acting as popular leaders bring things to the point of the people's being sovereign even over the laws." (22)
Of course, the immediate objection that can be made to this line of thought is that the law does not write itself. Someone must have the power to change old laws and pass new ones. Therefore, the rule of law can be seen as the rule of those who make the law. So it can be argued that there will always be some group of people who are "above the law".
Aristotle says in V vii 7 that "constitutional government turns into a democracy". And in that situation, Socrates, Plato and Aristotle fear the possibility that "Tyranny, then arises from no other form of government than democracy." In more recent times, Huey Long said that when fascism came to the United States it would call itself "democracy". (23) See The Kyklos.
Historically speaking, however, no modern democracy older than 30 years has ever succumbed to tyranny. In this respect, it seems that classical republics (such as Rome or Sparta) are more susceptible to collapse than modern republics.
The history of mixed government in America goes back to the chief founders of New England. The early Massachusetts government was predominantly aristocratic. John Cotton and John Winthrop had an aversion to democracy. The Puritan preachers strongly believed that Scriptures only approved monarchy and aristocracy. "At best, Winthrop and his friends believed in what they called 'a mixt aristocracy'". (24) (See section below on "Occurrences of the word".)
When the Articles of Confederation failed, a constitutional convention was convened to bring about a better form of federal government on 25 May 1787. Curiously, the popularity of democracy among the men who attended the Convention was not as high as would be expected. Governor Robert Morris of Pennsylvania believed that the Senate should be an aristocratic body composed of rich men holding office for life. Elbridge Gerry, a delegate from Massachusetts, declared that he "abhorred" democracy as "the worst of all political evils". Edmund Randolph, the governor of Virginia, believed that Virginia's Senate was designed as check against the tendencies of democracy. John Dickinson, another delegate, strongly urged that the United States Senate would be structured as nearly as possible to the House of Lords. (25) Finally, it appears Alexander Hamilton wanted the American government to mirror the British government and also proposed that the Senate be styled along the same lines as the House of Lords. (26)
Woodrow Wilson, in Division and Reunion (pg 12), wrote that "The Federal government was not by intention a democratic government. In plan and in structure it had been meant to check the sweep and power of popular majorities..." (27) Professor John D. Hicks in his book on The Federal Union said "Such statements could be multiplied almost at will." (28)Whether the non-democratic ideas of the 18th century remain relevant today, and whether or not the idea of an aristocratic Senate would be accepted or even tolerated by the American people in the 21st century, is another question entirely.
According to some interpretations, the tri-political concept of government and the tripartite form of mixed government (monarchy, aristocracy, democracy) can be allegedly seen in the United States Constitution.
The Presidency is the element of the monarchical office. The United States Senate is the representation of the aristocracy (Senators were elected by state legislatures until the ratification of the seventeenth amendment). The House of Representatives is the element of democracy, representing the people. The Senate was originally intended to be the representative body of the aristocracy and the landed gentry, as well as a representation of state's interests, as a corporate entity, in the Federal Government. Madison said, "The Senate, on the other hand, will derive its powers from the States, as political and coequal societies; and these will be represented on the principle of equality in the Senate, as they now are in the existing Congress." (29)
This is the original principle of a bicameral legislative house; i.e. the senate and the representatives. In Article III, sec 4, it states, "The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government..." This can be interpreted to mean that all the state governments must have a bicameral house with the upper house being the seat of the aristocracy, not elected by the people. However, it should be noted that not all states have a bicameral legislature, a fact that blunts the argument of those who claim that a Republican form of government as described in the constitution necessarily entails bicameral legislatures.
It has been claimed that the passage of the XVII amendment in 1913 fundamentally changed the character of the American government. It starts by saying that "The Senate of the United States shall be composed of two Senators from each State, elected by the people thereof,..."
Thus, today, both the Senators and the Representatives are elected by the people.
Aristotle notes that the disbanding of the Senate house of Athens, the Council on the Areopagus, was what turned Athens from a "politea" to a democracy. So, in classical terminology and definition, the U.S. form of government was changed from a republic to a democracy.
An integral part of mixed government is aristocracy. The word "aristocracy" is the combination of two Greek words: 'Aristos' means "the best" and 'kratos' means "power". Kratos is the same ending as in the word "democracy". Although aristocracy is generally regarded as a typical element of monarchy, it was also present in classical republics.
Such republics were Sparta and Crete. Just as Crete gave the name of Europe, she is also the birthplace of 'mixed'/constitutional government. Plato argued that "Persia and Athens show the fundamental elements of all political life exaggerated as far as possible in one direction and the other (the one monarchical, the other democratic)...the merit of Sparta is that she has been trying to blend them, and has therefore maintained herself for a long time." (30) (note, however, that Athens in Plato's time had maintained herself for roughly the same amount of time as Sparta, thus the source of Plato's claims is unknown; perhaps he refers to Sparta maintaining herself unchanged for longer than Athens, which was indeed the case)
Werner Jaeger argues that Socrates and Plato believed that "A state is never power alone, but the spiritual structure of the man whom it represents". (31) The forms of government are physical manifestations of the spiritual condition of the state which Socrates and Plato saw through the principle of Macrocosm/microcosm. A democracy's mentality is that the people are sovereign. The mentality of Despotism, as it can be seen in the Asian kings, Alexander the Great, his successors and the Roman Emperors starting with Julius Caesar, is that the king or Emperor makes the law so he is God. For the Spartan mindset, the Law is to rule not men collectively or singly as the Spartan King advises Xerxes at the Battle of Thermopylae, to wit, "The point is that although they're free, they're not entirely free; their master is the law, and they're far more afraid of this than your men are of you. At any rate, they do whatever the law commands...". (38)The Oxford Companion to Classical Literature states that the Romans translated Plato into Latin and gave it the title Respublica, "and is perhaps misleading". (32) The original Greek title of The Republic is Ty Politeia. (33) The Greek word for citizen is Polites. But because the Romans translated Plato's Politea as Republic, the revolutionaries of the French Revolution seeking to become "citizens" and run their own lives, gave themselves the title "Republicans" on the understanding that "republican" had the same meaning as "citizen".
Hence, since the French Revolution was a democratic movement, the words "democracy" and "republic" came to be intertwined. Republicanism in the French revolutionary meaning meant self-government with a constitution. In most books this is described as a democratic republic. It can also be described as constitutional democracy. Madison, in the Federalist Paper #39, uses the term "Republican branch" for the "House of Commons". In the twentieth century the word became even broader, with the French calling their parliamentary governments "Republics"; with the Spanish leftists calling their government a "Republic"; also with various autocratic governments (which would have been identified as monarchies in previous centuries) calling themselves "republics". For example, Mussolini's short-lived fascist state in northern Italy, which existed between 1943 and 1945, was called the "Italian Social Republic" (previous to the allied overthrow of his first regime, Fascist Italy had been a monarchy under king Victor Emmanuel III). Hitler once referred to the Third Reich as a "republic of the people" (eine volkische Republik), while Goebbels called it a "republican Fuhrer-state". (34) Many other non-democratic governments also referred to their states as "republics", though unlike Hitler and Mussolini, they generally tried to maintain some illusion of democracy through such means as sham elections.
It is suggested to use of the Loeb Classical Library of Harvard University Press for technical purposes. The original language and the English translation is placed side by side.
|