2 Affinities with other languages

Since the birth of comparative linguistics in the 19th century, the riddle of the apparently isolated Caucasian language families has attracted the attention of many scholars who have strenuously tried to relate them to other languages outside the Caucasus region. While no links with living languages have been found, there seem to be clear connections between the Northwest and Northeast Caucasian families and some extinct languages, formerly spoken in Anatolia and northern Mesopotamia.

2.1 Hattic

Some scholars have seen affinities between the Northwest Caucasian (Circassian) family and the extinct Hattic language. Hattic was spoken in Anatolia ( Turkey), in the area around ancient Hattusa (modern Bogazköy), until about 1800 BC, when it was replaced by the Indo-European Hittite language.

2.2 Hurrian and Urartian

Some scholars - notably the Russian historical linguists I. M. Diakonoff and Sergei Starostin - also see similarities between the Northeast Caucasian languages and the extinct languages Hurrian and Urartian. Hurrian was spoken in various parts of the Fertile Crescent in the 3rd and 2nd millennia BC. Urartian was the language of Urartu, a powerful state centered in the area of Lake Van in Turkey, that existed from 1000 BC or earlier to 585 BC.

The two extinct languages have been grouped into the Hurro-Urartian family, and the name Alarodian has been proposed for the union of the Northeast (and perhaps North-central) Caucasian and Hurro-Urartian families.

2.3 Basque

Many of the Caucasian languages have case systems (noun inflection rules) of a particular kind, known as ergative, which sets them apart from most European languages. The fact that Basque, an isolated language spoken in the Pyrenees, also has an ergative case system has led many scholars to propose it as a displaced member of some Caucasian family. However, the resemblances between the case systems of Basque and of the Caucasian languages have been found to be rather superficial. In fact linguists claim that the underlying structure of Georgian is not ergative.

3 Proposed higher-level classifications

Another topic that has attracted much research since the 19th century is the classification of the four major Caucasian families into larger groups, and their possible connections with other major linguistic families. Unfortunately this field is quite sensitive given the complex ethnic and political situation of the region, both before and after the extinction of the Soviet Union. As in many other regions of the globe, linguistic arguments are often used to back up or dismiss territorial disputes and separatist movements. Given the general paucity of linguistic and historical evidence for inter-family relationships, those political implications often dominate the debate.

3.1 Hetto-Iberian

The name Hetto-Iberian (or Proto-Iberian) was proposed by Georgian historian Simon Janashia for a superfamily comprising the South Caucasian languages, other Caucasian language groups, Hattic and other languages of ancient Anatolia. (The Iberian in the name refers to Caucasian Iberia, a kingdom centered in Eastern Georgia which lasted from the 4th century BC to the 5th century AD; it is not related to the Iberian Peninsula.)

3.2 Alarodian and North Caucasian

Some linguists see the three northern families as having a common origin, about five thousand years ago, and have proposed a family of North Caucasian languages with the following genetic classification:

• North Caucasian
  • Northwest Caucasian
  • Alarodian (Caspian)
    • Northeast Caucasian
    • North-central Caucasian
    • Hurro-Urartian

The reality of the North Caucasian family is not yet widely accepted; many of the cognates that have been claimed between its branches may actually be be loanwords.

3.3 Dene-Caucasian

Recently, some linguists — for instance, Merritt Ruhlen and John Bengtson — have proposed a Dene-Caucasian superfamily including, among others, Caucasian languages and Basque.

3.4 Ibero-Caucasian

The South Caucasian and North Caucasian families are unrelated phyla even in Greenberg's deep classification of the world's languages. Nevertheless, some scholars — notably Georgian linguist Arnold Chikobava — have proposed the single name Ibero-Caucasian languages (or Iberian-Caucasian languages) for all four Caucasus-specific language families, i.e. the union of the North and South Caucasian families. However, given the lack of significant common traits between these two families, this grouping is still only a convenient geographical term, not yet a linguistic concept.

4 External links

• TITUS Language map by Jost Gippert
• CIA ethnolinguistic map
• Linguistic families map by Matthew Dryer
• ethnolinguistic map of Tadjikistan by Iraj Bashiri
• The Iberian-Caucasian Connection in a Typological Perspective - An in-depth linguistic study of Basque, Georgian, and other ergative languages, concluding that the similarities are not string enough to prove a genetic link.
• The A. Chikobava Institute of Linguistics, Georgian Academy of Sciences
• Comparative Notes on Hurro-Urartian, Northern Caucasian and Indo-European by V. V. Ivanov

Caucasian languages Languages of Asia

<Hide>