Home > Allegations of domestic violence

1 Legal burden of proof

As against this, others including women's groups point out that the victim may be too frightened to give evidence to the police. Consequently, they argue that the burden of proof should be less, i.e. on the balance of probabilities, or the precautionary principle should be used.

2 Definition of domestic violence

The legal definition of domestic violence in common law countries (including the USA and UK) also includes non-physical assault e.g. stalking, silent phone calls, threatening language etc and "low-threshold" actions such as touching. Fathers' rights campaigners believe that a low threshold for what types of conduct can be construed as violent will be used in child proceedings to make allegations of violence against them on tenuous grounds. There are three definitions which have generated particular alarm due to the ease of fabrication as a basis for contact denial:

• Fear of violence

This is the view that even if there had been no violence, then the fear of violence from the father on the mother would be sufficient to deny contact with the child(ren). This matter is usually addressed in practice by arranging that no direct contact takes place between the parents at the point of changeover or by using contact centres.

• Stress arising from other parent's contact/(custody) application

This is the view that it is a risk to allow a parent-child relationship to continue where an application for contact results in stress to the child or child's carer. Thus, going to court to obtain parenting time with one's children can be used as a reason to deny it. [1]

• Denial as domestic violence

There is also concern that a man who denies that he has committed domestic violence may be regarded as committing domestic violence by his very denial.

3 False allegations of domestic violence

The prevalence of allegations of domestic violence when couples break up is not surprising. However, fathers' rights campaigners contend that many of these allegations are false and are motivated by the gains in property and child custody which may accrue to the alleged victim. High profile cases of false allegations of rape include that made against Neil Hamilton, the former British government minister. It is also pointed out that the Home Office Research Report 191 concluded that men and women were equally likely to initiate domestic violence; several studies in the USA have come to the same conclusion. Many are concerned that the prosecuting authorities simply do not take seriously the violence perpetrated by women on men.

The countervailing view is that there is evidence to disprove arguments that falsification of domestic violence claims are rampant and not genuine. The Domestic Violence Legislation Working Group of Australia has stated that there is no "firm evidence that misuse of the legislation is rampant", in the New South Wales Bureau of Crime Statistics evaluation report of the apprehended violence order (AVO) system have concluded that a majority of women taking out AVOs in situations of domestic violence have done so genuinely.

A further argument against widespread falsification relies upon the fact that lying about domestic violence is perjury which is severely punishable. Whilst this is an attractive argument it is weakened by the observation that perjury is very seldom, if ever, followed up in the family law system .