Home > Actus reus

The phrase derives from a quotation from Edward Coke actus non facit reum nisi mens sit rea, ¹ which roughly translated means "an act does not make someone a criminal unless (their) mind is guilty."

1 Incomplete crimes: attempts, conspiracy and counselling

The actus reus is often considered to be the criminal act. But what about cases where there was no actual criminal act committed? Can there nonetheless be criminal liability? There is a category of crimes that are sometimes called "incomplete crimes" where the concept of an act is interpreted to include crimes that are not only those crimes that completely carried out but are partially completed. Some might say that in just planning to commit a crime there is no act. However, it is possible to consider that the planning of a crime involves the "act of planning."

The first group of incomplete crimes are the attempted crimes, for instance attempted murder such as when someone points a gun, fires and does not hit the intended victim, killing no one. Even though the actus reus has not been completed, the intent and the attempt — which is considered a criminal act in itself — are sufficient to impose criminal liability. Section 24 of the Canadian Criminal Code defines being guilty of attempt as follows: 'any one who, with the intent to commit an offence, does or omits to do anything for the purpose of carrying out his intention is guilty...'. Compare this with section 5.01 of the Model Penal Code or the vague definition in the Revised penal lawIn the most general sense, penal is the body of laws that are enforced by the State in its own name and impose penalties for their violation, as opposed to civil law that seeks to redress private wrongs. This usage is synonymous with criminal law and is c of New York of 1967Events January January 4 British motorboat racer Donald Campbell dies while attempting a water speed record in Coniston Lake. January 4 Algerian revolutionary Mohammed Khider is shot in Madrid. January 6 Vietnam War: USMC and ARVN troops launch " Operatio section 110, "conduct which tends to effect the commission of .. the crime".

The problem with all definitions of attempted crimes is that the question of what act is sufficient to make the attempt more than just the expression of a thought to commit a crime, i.e. the remoteness of the act from the crime, in order to impose criminal liability. There may also be criminal liability even when the attempt to commit a crime is impossible, such as attempting to steal from an empty cash register or an empty pickpocketed wallet. A classic example is the attempt of someone to steal their own umbrella (thinking it was someone else's umbrella). As Viscount Dilhorne stated in the House of Lords case of Haughton v. SmithHaughton v. Smith [1975] AC 476, [1973] 3 All ER 1109, [1974] 3 W. 1 is the House of Lords case dealing with attempted crimes in relation to actus reus. Lord Dilhorne's statement about the impossibility of crimes is often quoted at 19 (citing to All E. [1975] AC 476 at 506:

A man taking his own umbrella from a club, thinking it the property of someone else, does not steal. His belief does not convert his conduct into an offence. In my view, it matters not that the crime cannot be committed as a result of physical impossibility, e.g. the absence of the property he wants to steal, or of legal impossibility. In either case he cannot be convicted of an attempt when he could not be convicted of the full offence if he had succeeded in doing all that he attempted to do. Conduct which is not criminal is not converted into criminal conduct by the accused believing that a state of affairs exists which does not.

Under the ancient common law when two or more people plan to commit a crime their act of planning, i.e. conspiracyAlternate uses: See Conspiracy (disambiguation Conspiracy in common usage, is the act of working in secret to obtain some goal, usually understood with negative connotations. As a legal term, conspiracy has historically been defined, in America, as an agr, may create criminal liability. The English Court of the Star ChamberThis article is about the historical court of law. For the online collectible card game of the same name, see Star Chamber (game); for the film of the same name, see Star Chamber (film). The Star Chamber was an English court of law at the royal Palace of decided in the 17th century16th century 17th century 18th century more centuries) As a means of recording the passage of time, the 17th century was that century which lasted from 1601- 1700. During this period, the power of England and the United Provinces increased; while that of that only an agreementThe term agreement has a variety of meanings. Law: It may be used to acknowledge the existence of a legally binding contract that can be enforceable in a court of law. Law: It may also refer to an understanding between individual to follow a specific cour was needed between two people for conspiracy to be found. In the federal and state jurisdictions of the United States 'conspiracy to commit a crime' is a criminal act. In United States v. Shabani ( 1994), the Supreme Court ruled: "... Congress intended to adopt the common law definition of conspiracy, which does not make the doing of any act other than the act of conspiring a condition of liability..." Note that a "conspiracy", under laws in the United States does not require there to be more than one person involved for a finding of criminal liability.

"Counselling to commit a crime", "incitement to commit a crime" or "facilitation to commit a crime" may each also be considered crimes in different jurisdictions.